just noticed when using --end, the number of messages listed at the top of the output is not correct. It looks like it's using the value set for end, which isn't right. I would expect to either always get the total list of the entire sub (which makes the most sense), or show the number of messages being worked against if --start or --end is used (eg, 2 message in the below example, not 10)
When no range defined
wwiv@beaglebbs:~$ ./wwivutil --v=1 messages dump wwivnet | head
Message Sub: 'wwivnet' has 1369 messages.
when --start defined (expected correct? behavior; shows total)
wwiv@beaglebbs:~$ ./wwivutil --v=1 messages dump --start=9 wwivnet | head
Message Sub: 'wwivnet' has 1369 messages.
when --start and --end defined (should be all or only 2)
Looks like it's either total # of messages (which is what I'd expect), or the value of --end. Not sure why, I'd also just expect the total count of messages (not how many are displayed)
just noticed when using --end, the number of messages listed at the top of the output is not correct. It looks like it's using the value set for end, which isn't right. I would expect to either always get the total list of the entire sub (which makes the most sense), or show the number of messages being worked against if --start or --end is used (eg, 2 message in the below example, not 10)
When no range defined
when --start defined (expected correct? behavior; shows total)
when --start and --end defined (should be all or only 2)
when --end defined (should be all or 9)
again, my expectation would be that the total for the entire sub is displayed in all cases.