yairm210 / Unciv

Open-source Android/Desktop remake of Civ V
Mozilla Public License 2.0
8.55k stars 1.58k forks source link

Do not upgrade units straightaway to their most recent version. #4792

Closed ravignir closed 3 years ago

ravignir commented 3 years ago

Make it impossible to update an archer to Machine Gun in one turn with one tap. I am playing Korea, I have Catapults and I can't upgrade them to Hwacha beecause they just become Cannons. And Hwacha's are better than cannons in certain situations. Same can be said about some other units. Also: that is how it works in civ5. You can only upgrade once per turn and gradually.

AdityaMH commented 3 years ago

But upgrade an unit one by one make upgrade price mooore higher than usual.

ajustsomebody commented 3 years ago

But upgrade an unit one by one make upgrade price mooore higher than usual.

i guess that's how it is in civ 5

ajustsomebody commented 3 years ago

i have one suggestion to add, a unit should be able to upgrade into more than 1 units for moddability

Caballero-Arepa commented 3 years ago

But this was decided by a poll...

ravignir commented 3 years ago

there should be at least an option to upgrade gradually.

ajustsomebody commented 3 years ago

But this was decided by a poll...

what about just being able to choose which one it will upgrade onto

like if you are upgrading a warrior there should be a list

swordsman (123Gold) longswordsman(123Gold) Musketman (123Gold) rifleman (123Gold) gw infantry (123Gold) etc (123Gold) etc(123Gold)

SomeTroglodyte commented 3 years ago

If ravignir says you need several turns in Civ5 for multi-step upgrades, then (apart from implicitly trusting their statements) that's a rule difference, and should be addressed. I am (now) all for the U button only doing one step. Choice would be a rule change and thus "not now". Volunteer coders? I'd rather fix half the key bindings hidden thanks to the 'More Button' first.

yairm210 commented 3 years ago

This was polled and decided upon. If anyone wants to code a modOptions for this they're welcome to PR it, but this is a "working as intended" for me.