Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by kevin...@gmail.com
on 11 Aug 2011 at 1:50
I'm a bit tardy in realizing how much LHS really should be emphasized over HS.
I think we should do this, unless we boldly change newHashSetWithExpectedSize
to return LHS itself!
Original comment by kevinb@google.com
on 16 Aug 2011 at 3:39
-1 to the last part: given that LHS has 25% more memory footprint compared to
HS, and that HS is already very bloated by itself, it's just too expensive to
unnecessarily redirect would-be users of HS, to LHS.
Original comment by jim.andreou
on 18 Aug 2011 at 6:44
er +1 to #3, i don't want to replace, just add.
Original comment by dnd1...@gmail.com
on 23 Aug 2011 at 4:42
The replacing idea was half-serious, and I think it's fine to just add this
(very long-named!) method.
Original comment by kevin...@gmail.com
on 1 Sep 2011 at 5:34
Original comment by kevinb@google.com
on 5 Oct 2011 at 5:02
Original comment by yrfselrahc@gmail.com
on 5 Dec 2011 at 6:35
Original comment by kak@google.com
on 8 Dec 2011 at 7:40
Original comment by kurt.kluever
on 8 Dec 2011 at 7:58
This issue has been migrated to GitHub.
It can be found at https://github.com/google/guava/issues/<id>
Original comment by cgdecker@google.com
on 1 Nov 2014 at 4:15
Original comment by cgdecker@google.com
on 3 Nov 2014 at 9:09
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dnd1...@gmail.com
on 10 Aug 2011 at 8:44