Closed Calinou closed 4 years ago
Hmmm... I see what you are saying. I generally by default use GPL in my projects to discourage closed source changes, but I can see where that may appear problematic in the commercial space. I'll go ahead and update to an MIT license.
License has been updated.
This repository is currently licensed under the GPLv3. This may be problematic for people working in companies as their legal department may forbid using any kind of GPL-licensed software.
Using a permissive license like MIT would avoid possible legal confusion. Not to mention a copyleft license is often difficult to enforce in a small project like this one :slightly_smiling_face: