Closed ChongWang1024 closed 3 months ago
Hi, As mentioned in the paper,
To ensure fairness, we employed the same pre-trained diffusion models and blur kernels for all methods in the comparison.
the same pre-trained diffusion models are used as denoisers to evaluate DPIR.
Hi, Thanks for your prompt reply. So you use the same network trained using diffusion training, and directly plugging into the DPIR iteration to produce the result?
Exactly, as we have argued in the paper that diffusion models are trained as denoisers (and we can use them as denoisers!)
Interesting! this has addressed my question.
@ChongWang1024 you may want to have a look at this slide to better (than the paper) understand this work (and related works)
@ChongWang1024 you may want to have a look at this slide to better (than the paper) understand this work (and related works)
Thanks, these slides help a lot!
Hi,
Thank you so much for sharing such an interesting work. I have a question about the results of DPIR on FFHQ and ImageNet (since these datasets are not evaluated in the original DPIR paper). Do you train the DPIR denoiser on FFHQ and ImageNet separately or directly use the original pretrained DPIR?
Thanks in advance!