Open yuricoder07 opened 1 year ago
Peer Grade: Yuri: 2.7
He completed all the hacks and the entire lesson correctly
MC wasn't over 90%
Reflection on the image questions was a bit lackluster yet was still completed for a greater score it would be better if this was completed properly.
Completed the hacks by completing wine analysis through data as a group however it was not implanted into CPT project so that could be completed for greater points.
Overall: Good job, Need a better score on the mc as it was below a 90% however the reflection questions were done very well.
MC Score: 0.9 2.2 Notes 0.9 2.3 Notes 0.9 Total 2.7
Self Grade: I think that I deserve to get an 2.7+
I completed the MC#3 with above a 50%, with test corrections and explanations on why I got them wrong.
My hacks are throughly completed, but I've not done any of the extra parts of the hacks for extra points. (I did not do the CPT integration).
Questions and comments are done throughly and I think that it showed good learning on my end
For the 2.3 Hacks I definitely should have experimented more with the database extraction with .csv and .json files.
Overall, I think that I deserve an 2.7+ for the MC score + corrections, the hacks that i throughly completed and the blog being pretty detailed.
Yuri - Week 25 Hacks
Collegeboard MCQ review 2.2 Image Compression Hacks 2.3 Extracting Information from data Hacks