Closed jarmo-seljamaa closed 4 months ago
Hi @jarmo-seljamaa, thank you for your feedback! I rephrased the 2 audit questions you pointed out to improve their clarity.
Thanks! However the new wording still contains negation:
Is the last validation set of the train data not overlapping with the test data?
Possible answers:
Would the following be clearer?
Is the last validation set of the train data not overlapping with the test data? Yes (the two sets are not overlapping) or no (the two sets are overlapping).
I've seen this type of solution in some earlier tasks:
Can you confirm that the last validation set of the train data is not overlapping with the test data?
Not the smoothest, but at least it doesn't have 3 possible answers.
sp500-strategies
As with other tasks in AI module, the instructions and audit questions lack proof-reading for spelling and clarity.
Train et validation?
From the audit:
Possible answers:
Audit has only singular Yes/No options, negation questions are silly to include.
Also this one:
Apart from the language problem (negation question + "do all not contain" can mean that some may contain?), it seems illogical. The data we are using is for 500 different stocks, so we do have 500 data points from the same day. It seems no problem to include the data from the same day in the folds, because the data is from different tickers. Perhaps there is something here, we're missing. If so, please do explain.