Have common extension functions that utilize the Encoder/Decoder abstraction
So a new encoder (not implemented by this library) can be utilized if library consumer creates it.
Optimization, because right now there is a lot of unnecessary array creation. Would be great if the
extension functions for the type (String, CharArray, ByteArray) were able to instantiate those types
off the bat and then input things as decoding/encoding occurs by converting the returned Byte.
Enable ability to have Encoder and Decoder classes which can be passed around
Enable ability to stream bytes/chars in or out, and receive encoded/decoded bytes on the other end
Encoder/Decoder configurations
Give people the ability to easily create their own Encoder/Decoders
Add a base module (i.e.
encoding-core) to:Encoder/DecoderabstractionString,CharArray,ByteArray) were able to instantiate those types off the bat and then input things as decoding/encoding occurs by converting the returnedByte.EncoderandDecoderclasses which can be passed aroundEncoder/DecoderconfigurationsEncoder/Decoders