What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.1.darray_set_by_index
2.1.get_by_index(thiz, 1, &pdata)
2.2.set_by_index(thiz, 2, pdata)
2.3.darray_destroy(thiz)
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
1.直接set而不去free原有的元素，导致原有的元素所指向的内��
�不再有指针来标记，从而无法释放造成内存泄漏。
2.此条为疑问。这样操作会造成index
1和2都指向同一块内存，在destroy的时候这块内存会被free两次�
��会不会出现什么问题？这个问题如果往下引申的话若数组中
有两个元素的指针指向同一块内存，其中一个元素被free之后�
��另一个指针的性质岂不是和野指针一样？这种情况下内存应
该如何管理呢？
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Last Changed Rev: 5
Last Changed Date: 2010-04-21 21:37:48 +0800 (Wed, 21 Apr 2010)
ubuntu
Please provide any additional information below.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by crystalh...@gmail.com on 28 Mar 2011 at 3:17
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
crystalh...@gmail.comon 28 Mar 2011 at 3:17