Closed karentroy closed 2 years ago
Hello, sorry for the delay!
I don't think that there is a theoretical solution to this problem in the SPM literature. The key difficulty is that the critical t statistic calculation requires a single degrees-of-freedom (DF) estimate. A similar problem exists in other cases, like unequal variance / nonsphericity estimates, which use DF adjustments. Theoretical SPM solutions exist for the nonsphericity case, wherein a single DF estimate is used for the entire 1D domain. These solutions are relatively complex, and I'm unsure whether a similar approach can be applied to this alternate t statistic case.
As an approximation I'd suggest:
t(q)
and df(q)
: the t statistic and DF at each point q
(as you have already done).mean(df)
(across the 1D domain) as the overall DF estimate.spm1d.rft1d.t.isf
to calculate the critical threshold.Note that Step 2 is a hack, and almost certainly not theoretically robust. However, provided the DF estimates do not vary widely across the domain (q
), the result should be similar to a theoretically robust solution.
Thanks - that's really helpful. Also, thanks for sharing the code and the doing such a great job explaining it so that we can use it! Much appreciated!
No problem, thank you for the feedback!
Hi there, I have two samples that are partially paired (some have condition A only, some condition B only and some are paired samples with both conditions). I can calculate an alternate t-statistic using the method outlined by Derrick here: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2251&context=jmasm .
By hand, for a single 0D value, I can calculate a new T-statistic and degrees of freedom. It comes out with a p-value somewhere between an independent 2-sample t-test and a paired t-test (not surprisingly). I would like to use a similar method to adopt the SPM1D code. However, the way the glm.m code is written, it's not clear to me how I might do this.
I can calculate the alternate t-statistic at each timepoint by hand without much trouble, but I cannot figure out how to calculate the critical test zstar value, which seems to be the crux of it. For example, when I put two dummy data sets in to the SPM1d code and calculate zstar based on either an independent 2-sample ttest vs a paired ttest, the zstar values differ quite a lot. I'm not sure I understand why.
Thanks! Karen