Closed menzejo closed 1 year ago
There are two problems with displaying p-values greater than alpha:
Cluster-level inference: these p-values are specific to clusters, as in the results above. A cluster exists only when alpha-defined threshold is traversed, so there are no clusters --- by definition --- when alpha is not traversed. So "non-significant" p-values do not exist for cluster-level inference.
Point-level inference: it is indeed possible to calculate p-values for individual points, but (a) these p-values become inaccurate why p gets large (p > 0.4), and (b) those p-values are not directly comparable to cluster-level results because they are different probabilities.
I therefore recommend against reporting p-values when p > alpha, and instead reporting just "p > alpha". This follows standard SPM practice for reporting cluster-level probabilities. Will this be satisfactory?
Dear SPM experts
We would like to display the range of p-values for nonsignificant differences in a continuous comparison between two groups using the Mann Whitney U test. We were curious if there is an option to do this using SPM, in the graphs below for example in the range between 40° to 60° of shoulder abduction:
When we do see significant differences the P-value is automatically depicted as below:
I am looking forward to your response!
Thank you and best regards Johanna Menze (johanna.menze@unibe.ch)