Closed anh151 closed 6 months ago
Hey @anh151, since you are on 4.5 you might want to try this new parameter: https://github.com/0xTCG/aldy/issues/66#issuecomment-1806982434
@rrdavis77 I tried using that parameter but I still get the same error. DId it work for you?
aldy genotype --param min_avg_coverage=0 -p wgs -g CYP2D6 -o aldy_results/aldy_1020075.tsv filtered_bams/1020075.bam
🐿 Aldy v4.5 (Python 3.9.15 on Linux 5.15.133+-x86_64-with-glibc2.31)
(c) 2016-2023 Aldy Authors. All rights reserved.
Free for non-commercial/academic use only.
Genotyping sample 1020075.bam...
Potential CYP2D6 gene structures for 1020075:
1: 2x*68 (confidence: 100%)
Potential major CYP2D6 star-alleles for 1020075:
1: 2x*68 & rs1135840 (confidence: 100%)
ERROR: gene= CYP2D6, profile= wgs, file= filtered_bams/1020075.bam
Aldy could not phase any major solution.
Possible solutions:
- Check the coverage. Extremely low coverage prevents Aldy from calling star-alleles.
- Run with --debug parameter and notify the authors of Aldy.
@anh151 This probably means that Aldy cannot refine the calls due to under-sequenced regions. I'd suggest using potential major star-alleles as the final output (2x*68): refinement anyways picks one of the major candidates.
Hello, We have a number of short read whole genome sequencing samples (~200) where Aldy is unable to assign a genotype due to low coverage. I was able to successfully run Cyrius and PyPGx on most of these samples and most have some kind of structural variant as part of a tandem. I.e 1/68+4 or 68/*68+4, etc. Coverage across the full dataset is roughly 35x, however it is possible that these samples have lower coverage than the rest. Is there a way to force Aldy to try to call these samples or would that just result in too much uncertainty in the call? Attached is debug file from one of the samples.
debug.info.tar.gz
Thanks, Andrew