Rewrite/improve the evaluate()-method to make it very clear what part of the results belongs to what data_idx, as they are currently returned in the order PRISM handles them (which has no logic for the user at all).
[ ] Split results up into the individual emulator iterations at which the sample was last evaluated;
[ ] Every result must show to which data point (data_idx) it belongs to;
Rewrite/improve the
evaluate()-method to make it very clear what part of the results belongs to whatdata_idx, as they are currently returned in the order PRISM handles them (which has no logic for the user at all).data_idx) it belongs to;data_idxto be given?