EWR network

[132ndNeck]

For advanced scenarios. Set up so that If EWR radar detects incoming flights, then SAM's are turned on. If EWR do not detect flight, the SAM's should be set so they take longer time to activate.

[132nd-Entropy]

Im happy to do this. What I need to get started is the actual EWR units placed in the ME named with a prefix that the script will be looking for. Example EWR_anyname. The script will add all units starting with the groupname EWR then to the network.

[theendsofinvention]

It is also possible to create multiple Sam networks

On Sun, 25 Mar 2018, 13:19 132nd-Entropy, notifications@github.com wrote:

Im happy to do this. What I need to get started is the actual EWR units placed in the ME named with a prefix that the script will be looking for. Example EWR_anyname. The script will add all units starting with the groupname EWR then to the network.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/132nd-vWing/TRM/issues/26#issuecomment-375962820, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUSp3_PLsCxEZ0loddwWomt9hPaTghkOks5th31PgaJpZM4S57EG .

[132nd-Entropy]

yeha I have been playing with DETECT (using SETs and its looks super useful! Much better than simply doing: when unit gets into a zone -> do this

[132ndNeck]

I will need to come with the specifications later, when the range complex is more in a finished state, and I can work on the EAST-WEST war / SOUTH-NORTH war scenarios for advanced trainings.

I will get back to the requirements and ideas in more detail later. (But feel free to add any inputs, suggestions, concerns, questions, etc.)

[132nd-Entropy]

@132ndNeck Id be happy to give this a try if you want to re-visit this

[132ndNeck]

Ok, I have been thinking about this a little now.

1. Can we make the following Threat Sites move if fired upon with a HARM (Turn off radar, move 50-200 meters in a random direction. Turn back on radar after a random interval between 1 and 5 minutes).:

   • Threat site 6
   • Threat site 5 -Threat site 8
   • Threat site 12 This is valid for also the options described below.

2. Can we create a menu called IADS1 (can be activated like any threat site). IADS1 will have the following features: Threat site 8, 10, 12 and 13 are on. Threat site 6,11 and 5 are off. Once a HARM is shot at Threat site 12 or 13, then 5/6/11 turns on. These then are on for a random interval between 2-5 minutes, before they are off in 2-4 minutes.

3. Can we create a menu called IADS2 (can be activated like any threat site) IADS2 will have the following features: Threat site 10/6/8 are on for 2-5 minutes, and off for 2-5 minutes in a random interval. Threat site 12/13/5/11 are off, until a aircraft are within range of one of these systems. Then they turn on and stay on. This can be measured from the EWR (added in the .miz with following name): EWR1

[132nd-Entropy]

Part 1 is finished. SEAD evasion is enabled for TS 5, 6, 8, 12. Note, you need to, like before, first enable those sites via the F10 menu

Will implement Parts 2 and 3 after 1 is tested

[132nd-Entropy]

@132ndNeck did you get a chance testing it yet?

[132nd-Entropy]

IADS1 is finished. It can be activated via F10 menu. needs testing please

[132nd-Entropy]

I would like to request some feedback on this when possible. Is this working? can it be closed?

[132ndNeck]

I would like to request some feedback on this when possible. Is this working? can it be closed?

I did some testing now. It seemed to work fine. However, I just realized that the SA-2 and SA6 will not move as they are not mobile. But they shut down, so SEAD was effective. For the SA-8, it shut down and moved, however, it never arrived at its new location.

I have additional request for this feature:

• Give a random interval between 5 and 30 seconds before the SAM shut down and start moving (also, shut down the radar 5-10 seconds before it starts moving.
• Also add a 20 % chance that the radar do now shut down and move.

This will make it more realistic, and SEAD pilots do not know what to expect, and can just shoot a HARM and then 100% know that SEAD will be effective.