Edits to Evaluation Criteria

[cdelor02]

Discussion and Future Work

• Making concrete where you think your work can go (and explaining it)
• Clearly delineate "future work" and "non features" of your DSL
• Perhaps don't discuss all of the goals of the project, just the most important ones

Evaluation:

• The paper does not need to be the only location of this evaluation (it could be in the video, or the artifact)
• The video is a good place for the "so what?" aspect of evaluation

Language Frontend Design:

• "expert" is a lofty term (we are not experts in the domain); "domain practitioner", or "intended user"
• We want to know our audience and make sure the level of detail is appropriate for them
• Being clear who the audience is for the paper and for the video (as they are not necessarily the same)
• Less about the work, is the reasoning for a given design decision apparent to the audience

Metaprogramming

• If I'm going to show "under the hood" of the project, what do we want the audience to get out of it

[jakebennert]

I edited the wiki with these updates!