Closed ultrasaurus closed 9 years ago
:+1: There are a bunch of different styles out there. Here is another...
I think we should have identify the exact purpose to make sure that we are focused in our style.
+1 to @jackiekazil - a code of conduct for employees has a different tone, voice, and backing authorities (gsa policy, the law) than one that covers events we host. And both would likely differ from one covering open-source projects.
I feel like the need is strongest for open source - aren't we covered to a certain extent in the other cases by existing policy?
Great point @jpyuda and @jackiekazil on audience and purpose.
I think it is important to have guidelines for our whole community, not just us. I can imagine a (not too distant) future where we could have a volunteer contributor (with commit rights) who is not a federal employee and we should be clear what behavior we expect from them.
Also, my guess is that online guidance about open source project behavior will be a superset of in-person, and it is likely simpler to have a single document (even though it might link to others).
I added everyone's examples, plus a draft outline and some text starting with a diversity statement. What do other people want to see in this? If folks are into it, we could schedule a group editing session to quickly come up with a first draft, maybe sometime next week after people have a chance to comment on goals.
@18F/18f does this tag a team? #testing
yup
If you hover over the tag, you can see who gets a notification
awesome. sorry to temporarily hijack the thread. for a good cause. :)
Joining the conversation late but would love to help drive this. Did I miss anything last week or is there something coming up?
I'm a fan of group editing a pull request to iron out what we want and where. Perhaps we begin with a pull request to create 18f.gsa.gov/code_of_conduct?
yeah, @jackiekazil and I were going to kick off a first draft. Thanks for waking up the thread!
Putting down assignees personally helps me query and visualize what ppl are working on across the repo and overall helps with "who's on first". It will also helps once we start rocking the GitHub API to create dashboards.
Thanks @NoahKunin -- happy to take responsibility to shepherding this!
Any updates?
@ultrasaurus @jackiekazil I'm loathe to close this one, since it seems like work has been done -- is this still something we want to get on the site?
We are in the process to putting together a draft to submit to the group in the near future.
this moved to its own repo here: https://github.com/18F/code-of-conduct
@gboone wanted to leave this open, since he's considering that it may be appropropriate to be displayed as a page on 18F site in the future
Wondering if we've made any in-roads to approval from the appropriate parties on this? If I'm remembering correctly, this is all that's blocking us from publishing:
Shipped May 12, 2015 with all approvals:
It is becoming common for open source projects and there are people who won't participate in events unless there is one.
Where will this be used? if human, then this applies
This should be published on the website for easy access.
I'd like the follow the Bridge Foundry model where the Code of Conduct is more than an anti-harrassment policy (which is what most conferences do) and instead describe a higher bar of acceptable conduct.
Examples:
More links added:
Proposed Outline
Diversity Statement
18F welcomes and encourages participation by everyone. We work for the America people, and welcome participation from anyone in the world with a desire to improve our projects.
No matter how you identify yourself or how others perceive you: we welcome you. We welcome contributions from everyone as long as they interact constructively with our community.
We are responsible for technical implementation, but most of our work is not technical in nature. We value and encourage contributions from those with expertise in policy, private sector or public service, writing, design, usability, as well as code, and welcome them into our community.