Open cmc333333 opened 8 years ago
Examples of the listed items:
Additional references to other kinds of items that aren't automatically linked:
Some external link formatting that could be improved:
@brittag what do you think those point to? Does the dash here mean "through"? I can make an argument for
26 CFR 301.7701-12
to mean
26 CFR 301.7701, 26 CFR 301.7702, ....26 CFR 301.7712
but the others are less clear to me.
It looks like "26 CFR 301.7701-12" is a specific section on page 740 of the linked document:
"26 CFR 1.1563-1" is a particular section as seen here - along with "26 CFR 1.1563-2" (starting on the last page of that PDF). Interestingly, I can't find "26 CFR 1.1563-1" in the document auto-linked from eRegulations.
And "26 CFR 301.6091-1(b)" points to a specific piece on page 61 of the linked document:
Innnteresting. We've not encountered sections with dashes in this like this (though we recently expanded the definition of a "section" to include non-numerals like "54a"). Annoyingly, we already use dashes to separate our hierarchy.
ATF F 5400.8 here: https://atf-eregs.18f.gov/555-103/2015-25190#555-103-a-1-iv-p1-p4
ATF F 5400.4 here: https://atf-eregs.18f.gov/555-105/2015-25190#555-105-b-3-i
ATF F 5400.14, ATF F 5400.15, ATF F 5400.16, ATF F 5400.21 here: https://atf-eregs.18f.gov/555-46/2015-25190#555-46-a
ATF F 5400.13 here: https://atf-eregs.18f.gov/555-45/2015-25190#555-45-c-1
A reference to a standard that could be linked:
Right now we only account for "ATF I 5300.1" and "ATF I 5300.2". What else?