Open toolness opened 8 years ago
I recently did a little survey of how many 18F repos had README.md vs. README.rst, and Markdown won by a million miles, so I must conclude a little sadly that Markdown in 18F's standard.
I could switch it over.
Ok! Don't get me wrong, I actually really like rst for Sphinx because it's a lot more powerful in that context... I'm just not a huge fan of it for READMEs, whose formatting needs are typically pretty simple...
Since I proposed this, I'm happy to take on this work myself, unless you really want to!
Hmm, @jmcarp noted in https://github.com/18F/autoapi/pull/75#issuecomment-231622931 that rst is better if we want our work to be reused by the wider python community.
I guess I'm fine with either, I just prefer that all our docs use the same format...
Currently the README is in reStructuredText, which has some disadvantages:
instructions.md
, or GitHub comments.The only potential advantage I see in using RST is that it'll be easy to migrate our documentation to Sphinx, but I don't see that happening anytime soon...