As an ASAP developer, in order to assist FedRAMP reviewers in ATO review, I want to identify when disclosures have not been provided.
Acceptance Criteria
[ ] All Schematron assertion messages are declarative statements which affirm the positive test outcome.
[ ] All Schematron assertion diagnostic messages are declarative statements which explain the negative test outcome.
[ ] The Schematron code has no assertion failures when validated using src/validations/styleguides/sch.sch using the basic phase.
[ ] XSpec unit tests for positive and negative Schematron assertion outcomes accompany all Schematron assertions (where feasible).
- [ ] terms-and-conditions has a part with an attribute of name with the value of 'disclosures'- [ ] There is at least one part with the attribute name with the value of 'disclosure' as a child of the criteria above.
[ ] the disclosure parts have prop elements with numerical sort-id values. These parts are ordered correctly (document order matches order of sort-id values)
Definition of Done
[ ] Acceptance criteria met
[ ] Unit test coverage of our code > 95%
[ ] Automated code quality checks passed
[ ] Security reviewed and reported
[ ] Reviewed against plain language guidelines
[ ] Code must be self-documenting
[ ] No local tech debt
[ ] Load/performance tests passed – needs to be created/automated
[ ] Documentation updated
[ ] Architectural Decision Record completed as necessary for significant design choices
Extended Description
Acceptance Criteria
src/validations/styleguides/sch.sch
using thebasic
phase.- [ ] terms-and-conditions has a part with an attribute of name with the value of 'disclosures'- [ ] There is at least one part with the attribute name with the value of 'disclosure' as a child of the criteria above.Definition of Done