As an ASAP Developer, in order to ensure that FedRAMP Reviewers know specific pieces of OSCAL are implemented, I want to check for correct handling of Communication of Test Results instructions for FedRAMP OSCAL.
Acceptance Criteria
[x] All Schematron assertion messages are declarative statements which affirm the positive test outcome.
[x] All Schematron assertion diagnostic messages are declarative statements which explain the negative test outcome.
[x] The Schematron code has no assertion failures when validated using src/validations/styleguides/sch.sch using the basic phase.
[x] XSpec unit tests for positive and negative Schematron assertion outcomes accompany all Schematron assertions (where feasible).
[x] metadata has a role element with an id attribute with a value of 'csp-results-poc'
[x] metadata has a responsible-party element with a role-id attribute of 'csp-results-poc'
[x] responsible-party element with a role-id attribute of 'csp-results-poc' has at least one party-uuid element
[x] the value of the above party-uuid element matches a party/@ uuid value in the associated SSP
[x] If the party-uuid does not match the SSP, there is a party/@ uuid defined in the SAP
Definition of Done
[x] Acceptance criteria met
[x] Unit test coverage of our code > 95%
[x] Automated code quality checks passed
[x] Security reviewed and reported
[x] Reviewed against plain language guidelines
[x] Code must be self-documenting
[x] No local tech debt
[x] Load/performance tests passed – needs to be created/automated
[x] Documentation updated
[x] Architectural Decision Record completed as necessary for significant design choices
Extended Description
Acceptance Criteria
src/validations/styleguides/sch.sch
using thebasic
phase.Definition of Done