EPIC - duplicate content between Methods and the 18F UX guide (and add redirects)

18F / guides

18F’s guides equip 18F teams, our partners, other practitioners, lawmakers, and the public with tools and practices to improve public services. They affirm experiences, build confidence, and empower exceptional digital experiences.

https://guides.18f.gov

Other

37 stars 22 forks source link

EPIC - duplicate content between Methods and the 18F UX guide (and add redirects) #397

Closed andrewmaier closed 5 months ago

andrewmaier commented 5 years ago

POs to break out the specific places that have duplicative content across sites.

Migrate

[x] Example interview script
[ ] Example usability test script
[x] Interview checklist
[x] Post-interview debrief
[ ] Running issue log

Remove duplicate fundamentals

[ ] Recruiting
[ ] Incentives
[ ] Privacy

Update

[ ] Setup redirects
[ ] Any links in the current resources
[ ] Privacy act statement for design research

juliaklindpaintner commented 5 years ago

Add "Usability Testing Quality Heuristics" to this list of things to migrate to the UX Guide (referenced in issue 18F/ux-guide#335).

juliaklindpaintner commented 4 years ago

@MelissaBraxton I wanted to make you aware of this outstanding issue in our repo. Let us know if the Methods Team can be of help as the UX Guide is launched!]

bpdesigns commented 1 year ago

@MelissaBraxton in the "Update" section of this issue it talks about Updating the "Privacy impact assessment for design research" and "Privacy act statement for design research" - do you think that belongs as part of this issue?

MelissaBraxton commented 1 year ago

I'm not sure what kinds of updates are needed--the latest drafts were done in 2021 and 2022--years after this issue was created, so I'm guessing the "update" work is done.

The Privacy Act Statement for Design Research is here on the GSA site, and I don't know what we'd need to update there. However, this GSA page points folks to the Privacy Impact Assessment for Design Research, but there is actually no PIA doc for design research listed there.

I found the PIA statement here, so maybe it's just a matter of making sure the PIA statement is findable from the Privacy methods card (and letting whoever is managing the GSA site know it should be added to the list of PIAs)?

bpdesigns commented 1 year ago

Linking to the method card make sense to me.

The PIA reviewed annually by the TTS Research Guild. I'll let them know that its not on the GSA page and they can take it from there.

bpdesigns commented 1 year ago

Removed tasks related to the PIA. According to @megan-moser the TTS Research Guild co-lead, that because research is a process not a system we do not need a PIA.

claireb-gsa commented 5 months ago

Partially completed by https://github.com/18F/TLC-crew/issues/736

bpdesigns commented 5 months ago

Closing as stale