search

18F / open-source-policy

This repository contains the official Open Source Policy of 18F
https://18f.gsa.gov
Other
298 stars 94 forks source link

Write dedicated doc on how to acquire open-source #8

Closed NoahKunin closed 4 years ago

NoahKunin commented 10 years ago

Inclusive of market research, procuring support services, ensure IDIQs produce/use open-source, etc etc etc.

Cross ref with issue #1

cc @rjmajma @konklone

gbinal commented 10 years ago

Strongly suggest including a first pass at sample procurement language, a la http://18f.github.io/API-All-the-X/pages/procurement_language.

I'm happy to help gather a first pass

webmaven commented 9 years ago

Has any more work been done on this?

konklone commented 9 years ago

I don't think anyone's done anything on this yet, no. It's definitely a gap in the field of government open source policies.

webmaven commented 9 years ago

@cjoh and @onezerojeremy may have something to contribute in this area.

benbalter commented 9 years ago

Strongly suggest including a first pass at sample procurement language

Some sample open source language via @NoahKunin (government email required)

NoahKunin commented 9 years ago

I'm eye deep in non open source procurement right now, but would love to revisit soon.

On Monday, October 13, 2014, Ben Balter notifications@github.com wrote:

Strongly suggest including a first pass at sample procurement language

Some sample open source language via @NoahKunin https://government-community.githubapp.com/government/best-practices/blob/master/docs/procurement/contract-boilerplate/open-source-mandate.md

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/18F/open-source-policy/issues/8#issuecomment-58889750 .

Noah Kunin - Delivery Architect @noahkunin http://twitter.com/noahkunin | @18F https://twitter.com/18F

konklone commented 8 years ago

@NoahKunin @vzvenyach @adelevie Do we have some good example language from the Agile BPA we can use to resolve the issue?

afeld commented 4 years ago

Closing as stale.

djwhitten commented 4 years ago

I have no doubt it is stale. I don't know if the sample language has been written. I expect if it has not, that it is still needed. Dave

vdavez commented 4 years ago

@afeld @djwhitten happy to revive it in a new issue. happily, there's a lot of potential prior art now. :D

afeld commented 4 years ago

Yep, just "stale" in the "we don't plan to get to this in the near future" sense. Anyone, feel free to drop links to other resources in this thread.