Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Is warning level 4 high or low? That is, is it a particularly pedantic warning
level? "while (1)" is idiomatic in this codebase, and seems perfectly
reasonable to
me; I don't see a particular reason to change it to "for (;;)". We also might
use
do/while(0) in macros, which would be harder to avoid that warning.
I'll just supress warning C4127 in the windows compile.
Original comment by csilv...@gmail.com
on 9 Oct 2007 at 9:00
Sparsehash 0.9 was just released, which should fix this problem.
Original comment by csilv...@gmail.com
on 9 Oct 2007 at 10:39
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mark.sar...@gmail.com
on 27 Aug 2007 at 10:29