Closed segalinc closed 5 years ago
Hi @cristinasegalin, while the authors of 3DDFA do not offer a direct comparison, judging from the results reported in [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.01005.pdf, Table 3] and the ones from [https://ibug.doc.ic.ac.uk/media/uploads/documents/trigeorgis2016mnemonic.pdf (MDM), Table 1] we can notice that new 3DDFA has approximatevely the same accuracy as CFSS on 300W. Since MDM significantly outperforms CFSS and our method surpasses MDM, most likely on average our method will outperform the improved 3DDFA results by a helthy margin. In addition, our method doesn't suffer from the failure cases reported in Fig. 20. That beign said, while this is the most likely conclusion, the best will be to evaluate them on a common dataset, ie. 300W or LS3D-W-Balanced.
Thanks for the quick reply. Really appreciated.
HI, thank you for your contribution on this topic. I am curious to understand how your approach compare w.r.t the new improved version of 3DDFA reported at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.01005.pdf
Thank you.