[Bug] markdown-alert-title is not contained

[1chooo]

https://github.com/chrisweb/rehype-github-alerts/issues/8

related: #440 , #441

• [ ] #443

[1chooo]

p: (props) => {
    const { node, children, ...rest } = props;
    const hasImage = node && node.children && node.children.some(isImageNode);
    if (hasImage) {
        return <>{children}</>;
    }
    return <p {...rest}>{children}</p>;
},

p: (props) => {
  const { node, children } = props;
  const hasImage = node && node.children && node.children.some(isImageNode);
  if (hasImage) {
    return <>{children}</>;
  }
  return <p>{children}</p>;
},

what is the different between this two logic?

---

The two code snippets have minor differences in handling props and rendering logic. Let’s analyze them in detail:

First Snippet

p: (props) => {
    const { node, children, ...rest } = props; // Destructures `node`, `children`, and `rest`
    const hasImage = node && node.children && node.children.some(isImageNode);
    if (hasImage) {
        return <>{children}</>; // Renders only children if there's an image
    }
    return <p {...rest}>{children}</p>; // Spreads remaining props (`rest`) onto <p>
}

Key Details:

1. Destructuring with ...rest:

   • Any extra props passed to this component (besides node and children) are captured in rest.
   • These props are then spread into the <p> tag.

2. Flexibility:

   • Allows additional attributes, like className, style, etc., to be applied to the <p> tag.

3. Use Case:

   • Suitable when the <p> tag needs to support extra props.

---

Second Snippet

p: (props) => {
    const { node, children } = props; // Only destructures `node` and `children`
    const hasImage = node && node.children && node.children.some(isImageNode);
    if (hasImage) {
        return <>{children}</>; // Renders only children if there's an image
    }
    return <p>{children}</p>; // Doesn't pass any additional props to <p>
}

Key Details:

1. No ...rest:

   • Ignores any extra props passed to the component.
   • The <p> tag will only have children as its content, without any additional attributes.

2. Simpler Logic:

   • Less flexibility since extra props like className or style are ignored.

3. Use Case:

   • Ideal when no additional props are expected or required.

---

Key Differences

1. Handling Extra Props:

   • First snippet: Supports additional props (rest).
   • Second snippet: Ignores any extra props.

2. Flexibility vs. Simplicity:

   • First snippet: More flexible but slightly more complex.
   • Second snippet: Simpler but less capable.

---

Recommendation

• Use the first snippet if the <p> element needs styling, classes, or other attributes dynamically applied.
• Use the second snippet if extra props are not needed, and you want a minimal implementation.