enable RF433 function and RF315 function that will lose wireless data

[isharrrry]

Describe the bug when i

#define ZgatewayRF     "RF"
#define ZgatewayRF315  "RF315"

enable RF 433MHz function and RF 315MHz function that will not accurate wireless data，the 315MHz value output in RFToMQTT （433MHz）. i think because both use RCSwitch library ，when RCSwitch.h file has static variable define .

    static int nReceiveTolerance;
    volatile static unsigned long long nReceivedValue;
    volatile static unsigned int nReceivedBitlength;
    volatile static unsigned int nReceivedDelay;
    volatile static unsigned int nReceivedProtocol;
    const static unsigned int nSeparationLimit;

when both use available() function that static variable cloud not accurate tell which object ？mySwitch or mySwitch315？ the RF 433MHz function run first，so the RF 315MHz value output in RFToMQTT ？

To Reproduce enable :

define ZgatewayRF "RF"

define ZgatewayRF315 "RF315"

and use 315MHz remote control

Screenshots

Environment (please complete the following information): OpenMQTTGateway version used 0.9b RCSwitch library by lib. dir. V2.6.2

And ,sorry by my English language bad.

[1technophile]

Hello,

Did you changed the pins in config_RF.h or are they the same compared to config_RF315.h?

[isharrrry]

Yes, I have changed pin , use difference pin or try use default pin connect 315 send , 315 recv. ,433 send and 433 recv. four module . And I try switching order RFToMQTT() with RF315ToMQTT() ,that will only recv. 315MHZ message .So i think is static variables problem.

来自 移动设备

-------- 原始邮件 -------- 发件人：Florian notifications@github.com 时间：2019年1月11日 03:16 收件人：1technophile/OpenMQTTGateway OpenMQTTGateway@noreply.github.com 抄送：创客Harrrry harrrry@foxmail.com,Author author@noreply.github.com 主题：Re: [1technophile/OpenMQTTGateway] enable RF433 function and RF315 function that will lose wireless data (#344)

Hello,

Did you changed the pins in config_RF.h or are they the same compared to config_RF315.h?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/1technophile/OpenMQTTGateway","title":"1technophile/OpenMQTTGateway","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/1technophile/OpenMQTTGateway"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@1technophile in #344: Hello,\r\n\r\nDid you changed the pins in config_RF.h or are they the same compared to config_RF315.h?"}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/1technophile/OpenMQTTGateway/issues/344#issuecomment-453218524"}}} [ { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { "@type": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/1technophile/OpenMQTTGateway/issues/344#issuecomment-453218524", "url": "https://github.com/1technophile/OpenMQTTGateway/issues/344#issuecomment-453218524", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]

[isharrrry]

你好，

您是否更改了config_RF.h中的引脚，或者它们与config_RF315.h相比是否相同？

Hello,

Did you changed the pins in config_RF.h or are they the same compared to config_RF315.h?

Yes, I have changed pin , use difference pin or try use default pin connect 315 send , 315 recv. ,433 send and 433 recv. four module . And I try switching order RFToMQTT() with RF315ToMQTT() ,that will only recv. 315MHZ message .So i think is static variables problem.

[1technophile]

Your problem is regarding sending, receiving, on 315, on 433 or nothing is working?

[isharrrry]

Both can't work at the one time

[1technophile]

Strange I don't see any reason why emitting could not work on both gateways on the same board. I will test it

[isharrrry]

Strange I don't see any reason why emitting could not work on both gateways on the same board. I will test it

a simple test. use default pin Connect the RF 433mhz signal to the pin 0 // #define RF_RECEIVER_PIN 0 // D3 on nodemcu Press the remote control message：

Creating RF315 buffer
Rcv. RF315
LED MNG
isAduplicate?
Adv data RF315toMQTT
Pub json into:
home/RuiZhuRF/315toMQTT
{"value":3043441,"protocol":1,"length":24,"delay":324}
Store to avoid duplicate
Min ind: 
7
store code :
3043441/855583
Col: val/timestamp
0:23776/541580
1:3043441/546615
2:3043441/549970
3:3043441/553563
4:3043441/557448
5:3043441/575932
6:3043441/580270
7:3043441/855583
8:380430/526281
9:3043441/535932
10:3043441/538949
11:380430/539030
Creating RF315 buffer
Rcv. RF315
LED MNG
isAduplicate?
--don't pub. duplicate--
Creating RF315 buffer
Rcv. RF315
LED MNG
isAduplicate?
--don't pub. duplicate--

Only change signal pin 0 to the pin 4 //#define RF315_RECEIVER_PIN 4 // D3 on nodemcu （code ,signal not change , no download . only change cable pin 0 to the pin 4） Press the remote control message：

Creating RF315 buffer
Rcv. RF315
LED MNG
isAduplicate?
Adv data RF315toMQTT
Pub json into:
home/RuiZhuRF/315toMQTT
{"value":3043441,"protocol":1,"length":24,"delay":323}
Store to avoid duplicate
Min ind: 
8
store code :
3043441/991919
Col: val/timestamp
0:23776/541580
1:3043441/546615
2:3043441/549970
3:3043441/553563
4:3043441/557448
5:3043441/575932
6:3043441/580270
7:3043441/855583
8:3043441/991919
9:3043441/535932
10:3043441/538949
11:380430/539030
Creating RF315 buffer
Rcv. RF315
LED MNG
isAduplicate?
--don't pub. duplicate--

As mentioned above, it has been 315 in preemption work, 433 is not working

[1technophile]

I don't see the link between my remark and the examples given, I'm talking about emitting and you are giving extract of receiving. When I'm talking about emitting I'm talking about the gateway as an emitter.

[isharrrry]

I don't see the link between my remark and the examples given, I'm talking about emitting and you are giving extract of receiving. When I'm talking about emitting I'm talking about the gateway as an emitter.

I am sorry, my friend. The gateway as an emitter is not problem，i away talking receiving

[1technophile]

Currently discussed here: https://community.openmqttgateway.com/t/is-it-possible-to-have-315-and-433-at-the-same-time/442/6