Closed AlekseyPanas closed 1 year ago
Nice catch! There is incorrect behaviour when the undo queue overflows (seems like I was writing the undo feature way too late at night). I've also extended the undo queue from 50 operations to 100 operations. Pushed a fix in 0.1.6.
Should be resolved in 0.1.6. Re-open if something goes wrong!
This is a very obscure bug. I've been working for many hours over the course of multiple days without restarting the program.
I pressed undo and for some reason it removed some earlier change instead a recent one. This has never happened before and restarting the program fixed the issue.
I don't have a consistent replication procedure, but maybe the data structure that you use to store the sequence of changes filled up (if thats even possible)?