Issue Compiling under Fedora 27

[Joykiller]

Below is the error compile code from console. These are the steps I took to compile under fedora..

1: ./autogen.sh 2: ./configure LDFLAGS="-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib64 -L/usr/local/lib/ -L/usr/local/lib64/" CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/include/" 3: make

Then... the following gets this far

In file included from util.h:20:0,
                 from alert.cpp:14:
tinyformat.h: In static member function ‘static const char* tinyformat::detail::FormatIterator::streamStateFromFormat(std::ostream&, unsigned int&, const char*, int, int)’:
tinyformat.h:781:17: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
         out.setf(std::ios::uppercase);
         ~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tinyformat.h:782:5: note: here
     case 'x':
     ^~~~
tinyformat.h:788:17: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
         out.setf(std::ios::uppercase);
         ~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tinyformat.h:789:5: note: here
     case 'e':
     ^~~~
tinyformat.h:794:17: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
         out.setf(std::ios::uppercase);
         ~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tinyformat.h:795:5: note: here
     case 'f':
     ^~~~
tinyformat.h:799:17: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
         out.setf(std::ios::uppercase);
         ~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tinyformat.h:800:5: note: here
     case 'g':
     ^~~~
  CXX      libbitcoin_server_a-bloom.o
  CXX      libbitcoin_server_a-chain.o
  CXX      libbitcoin_server_a-checkpoints.o
  CXX      libbitcoin_server_a-init.o
In file included from spork.h:42:0,
                 from init.cpp:30:
luxsend.h:11:10: fatal error: masternode-payments.h: No such file or directory
 #include "masternode-payments.h"
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.

How to fix?

[Joykiller]

config log https://0bin.net/paste/oDjhlZRdzbbJZtlB#k+SwNhfrEcXGF9ErWU0F3r2pcYx3Sike6yjz0Qr8M6i

[Joykiller]

Downloaded the beta version ran again and its now issuing:

In file included from test/wallet_tests.cpp:5:0: ./wallet.h:286:10: note: candidate: bool CWallet::SelectCoinsMinConf(const string&, const CAmount&, int, int, std::vector, std::set<std::pair<const CWalletTx, unsigned int> >&, CAmount&) const bool SelectCoinsMinConf(const std::string &account, const CAmount& nTargetValue, int nConfMine, int nConfTheirs, std::vector vCoins, std::set<std::pair<const CWalletTx, unsigned int> >& setCoinsRet, CAmount& nValueRet) const; ^~~~~~ ./wallet.h:286:10: note: candidate expects 7 arguments, 6 provided In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/test/unit_test.hpp:19:0, from test/wallet_tests.cpp:13: test/wallet_tests.cpp:281:98: error: no matching function for call to ‘CWallet::SelectCoinsMinConf(const CAmount&, int, int, std::vector&, CoinSet&, CAmount&)’ BOOST_CHECK(wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(COIN, 1, 6, vCoins, setCoinsRet2, nValueRet)); ^ In file included from test/wallet_tests.cpp:5:0: ./wallet.h:286:10: note: candidate: bool CWallet::SelectCoinsMinConf(const string&, const CAmount&, int, int, std::vector, std::set<std::pair<const CWalletTx, unsigned int> >&, CAmount&) const bool SelectCoinsMinConf(const std::string &account, const CAmount& nTargetValue, int nConfMine, int nConfTheirs, std::vector vCoins, std::set<std::pair<const CWalletTx, unsigned int> >& setCoinsRet, CAmount& nValueRet) const; ^~~~~~ ./wallet.h:286:10: note: candidate expects 7 arguments, 6 provided In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/test/unit_test.hpp:19:0, from test/wallet_tests.cpp:13: test/wallet_tests.cpp:297:101: error: no matching function for call to ‘CWallet::SelectCoinsMinConf(CAmount, int, int, std::vector&, CoinSet&, CAmount&)’ BOOST_CHECK(wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(90*CENT, 1, 6, vCoins, setCoinsRet , nValueRet));

[rej156]

Closing due to inactivity

[MGWalkup]

Not sure if you're still having the issue. I've found a possible work around. The warning is merely letting you know that the switch body seems to be missing the break; keyword after a case:...

Bc some cases (pun not intended) should NOT have the break, you can silence the warning (the block below as an example).

The Redhat Developer Blog has a good explanation

TL;DR: It depends on the version of C++ you're using:

switch (cond) { case 1: bar (1); attribute ((fallthrough)); // C and C++03 case 2: bar (2); [[gnu::fallthrough]]; // C++11 and C++14 case 3: bar (3); [[fallthrough]]; // C++17 and above / ... / }