Closed minjoong507 closed 8 months ago
hello, have you solved the problem? Did you use the pytorch implementation?
Rank@1, IoU=0.3: 39.39 Rank@1, IoU=0.5: 28.12 Rank@1, IoU=0.7: 15.90 mean IoU : 28.23
Hi @EricLina,
If you ask for differences in the model's performances, the possible reason for this might be using different visual features.
Quoting from [2], "Note 2D-TAN [1] pre-processes the TACoS dataset, making it slightly different from the original one."
As shown in [2], there is a clear difference in performance when using the pre-processed visual features from [1].
I achieved higher performance on TACoS than what was reported in the original paper because this repository utilized the visual features from [1].
[1] Learning 2D Temporal Adjacent Networks for Moment Localization with Natural Language, AAAI 2020
[2] Parallel Attention Network with Sequence Matching for Video Grounding, ACL 2021
Hi there. Thanks for sharing your great work!
I'm trying to reproduce the results in Table 2. (on TACoS dataset)
However, my results and the report in Table 2 are totally different.
Can you give me a detail to reproduce the results in Table 2?