only allow fac: prefixed concepts in a simple rule?

[dknochen]

Hi,

The initial version of fac:TemporaryEquity imputation is based on a "us-gaap:RedeemableNoncontrollingInterestEquityCommonCarryingAmount":

---

for $facts in facts:facts-for-internal(( "fac:TemporaryEquity", "us-gaap:RedeemableNoncontrollingInterestEquityCommonCarryingAmount"), $hypercube, $aligned-filter, $concept-maps, $rules, $cache, $options)

group by $canonical-filter-string :=

The rule editor doesn't allow me to convert this, as it automatically assumes that the Arithmetic Rule member has a "fac:" prefix

For now, as a work around I used RedeemableNoncontrollingInterest instead, in the Arhitmetic Rule. Thanks, Emma

[dknochen]

That’s a good point. I think we should discuss if a rule can only be based on concepts defined in the report in order to be self-contained.

Matthias

[dknochen]

I agree it needs a quick discussion. I don't see a problem with supporting any prefix in the simple formulas.

On the other hand, you could also add a mapping to the us-gaap concept, but that seems cumbersome.

[MatthiasBrantner]

I agree it needs a quick discussion. I don't see a problem with supporting any prefix in the simple formulas.

On the other hand, you could also add a mapping to the us-gaap concept, but that seems cumbersome.

It might be a little overhead but we need to understand the semantics of a report and the rules that it contains. The question is whether rules and imputations should be allowed to go to the outside world or whether the taxonomy/report is closed with that respect. The advantage being that there is one clear channel that goes to the outside world.

I think we should start with this restriction and eventually open it up if required. If it’s too cumbersome, the editor can always provide an easy way for creating such a concept.

Matthias

[dknochen]

this has been discussed and been agreed on