search

2i2c-org / infrastructure

Infrastructure for configuring and deploying our community JupyterHubs.
https://infrastructure.2i2c.org
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
103 stars 63 forks source link

[Request deployment] New Hub: binder.hhmi.2i2c.cloud #3655

Closed jmunroe closed 2 months ago

jmunroe commented 7 months ago

A part of https://github.com/2i2c-org/infrastructure/issues/4109.

Phase 2: Cluster

Use the existing hhmi cluster.

Phase 3: Hub Setup

Hub 1: binder

Phase 3.1: Initial setup (READY)

Question Answer Notes
Name of the hub binder
Dask gateway? no
URL binder.hhmi.2i2c.cloud
BinderHub UI? yes
Authentication Mechanism None
Admin Users NA Because BinderHub UI will be used
Persistent Home Directory no

Phase 3.2: Object storage access (READY)

Question Answer Notes
Scratch bucket enabled? no
Persistent bucket enabled? no
Requestor pays requests to external buckets allowed? no

Phase 3.3: Profile List (READY)

N/A, as BinderHub UI will be used

Phase 3.31: Resource configuration (READY)

No profile list, properties set under singleuser

Question Answer
memory limit 256M
memory request 1G
CPU limit 2

Phase 3.4: Authentication tuning (READY)

Question Answer
Authentication Mechanism None

Phase 3.5: Profile List finetuning (NA)

NA, as BinderHub UI will be used

Phase 3.6: BinderHub config (NOT READY)

Question Answer
Allowed Repositories? ^binder-examples/.*|LorenFrankLab/.*$
Banner Message ""
BinderHub About Message ""
github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

Hey @pending and @jmunroe! 👋 I noticed there is still pending information about the new hub deployment. Can you please help us fill it in?

The information pieces still missing, are: - community representative handle
- technical support contacts listed
- hub authentication type
- first hub administrators
- extra features you would like to enable
- other relevant information to the features above

Details about each of them can be found in the top comment. But if you have questions about any of them, please ping the 2i2c/engineering team and they will help you.

After the form in the top comment is filled in, an engineer will be assigned and will start deploying the new hub 🚀. Thank you!

jmunroe commented 7 months ago

I appreciate the @consideRatio breakdown in https://github.com/2i2c-org/meta/issues/804 of functionality. To make this request more specific, I think this new binder.hhmi.2i2c.cloud should enable

The existing hhmi.2i2c.cloud should have

And for completeness, the hub spyglass.hhmi.2i2c.cloud recently deployed has

Does specifying hubs with this list of requested functionality help give flexibility to @2i2c-org/engineering ?

haroldcampbell commented 6 months ago

This can be delay in favour of the catalyst hubs. @jmunroe shared that perspective on slack.

yuvipanda commented 2 months ago

I spoke to @jmunroe and it's time to pick this up again.

I have reformatted this to use the newer format for hub requests.

sgibson91 commented 2 months ago

I tried to deploy this in https://github.com/2i2c-org/infrastructure/pull/4320 but authentication to the image registry is failing. I tried GAR instead of quay.io because it is a GCP cluster. I also tried implementing https://github.com/2i2c-org/binderhub-service/issues/113 incase that is specific to GAR binders (the binderhub-ui-demo hub is also on GCP), but that still didn't work.

We should timebox this and if not reasonable solution can be found, I'll just use quay.io instead.

yuvipanda commented 2 months ago

We should timebox this and if not reasonable solution can be found, I'll just use quay.io instead.

Great call, @sgibson91!

sgibson91 commented 2 months ago

Just used quay.io instead