Closed sgibson91 closed 3 days ago
Merging this PR will trigger the following deployment actions.
Cloud Provider | Cluster Name | Upgrade Support? | Reason for Support Redeploy | Upgrade Staging? | Reason for Staging Redeploy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
aws | catalystproject-africa | No | Yes | Following helm chart values files were modified: staging.values.yaml |
Cloud Provider | Cluster Name | Hub Name | Reason for Redeploy |
---|---|---|---|
aws | catalystproject-africa | nm-aist | Following helm chart values files were modified: nm-aist.values.yaml |
aws | catalystproject-africa | must | Following helm chart values files were modified: must.values.yaml |
aws | catalystproject-africa | uvri | Following helm chart values files were modified: uvri.values.yaml |
aws | catalystproject-africa | wits | Following helm chart values files were modified: wits.values.yaml |
aws | catalystproject-africa | kush | Following helm chart values files were modified: kush.values.yaml |
aws | catalystproject-africa | molerhealth | Following helm chart values files were modified: molerhealth.values.yaml |
aws | catalystproject-africa | aibst | Following helm chart values files were modified: aibst.values.yaml |
aws | catalystproject-africa | bhki | Following helm chart values files were modified: bhki.values.yaml |
aws | catalystproject-africa | bon | Following helm chart values files were modified: bon.values.yaml |
Getting the same error here as on JMTE #5101
2024-11-18 14:05:26 [✖] found 1 nodegroup(s) (nb-bon-r5-16xlarge) without shared security group, cluster networking maybe be broken
2024-11-18 14:05:26 [✖] it's recommended to create new nodegroups, then delete old ones
2024-11-18 14:05:26 [✖] as a temporary fix, you can patch the configuration and add each of these nodegroup(s) to "sg-093ed905c45100bc1"
Resource handler returned message: "The maximum number of rules per security group has been reached. (Service: Ec2, Status Code: 400, Request ID: 0e9ce1e3-bf07-4b15-a7cb-a6d80b617098)" (RequestToken: b9dff271-941d-ffdd-7bb2-44ec6d286986, HandlerErrorCode: ServiceLimitExceeded)
I tried to resolve this by increasing our "Security groups per network interface" quota, but that did not mitigate the problem.
Resolved by increasing the "Inbound or outbound rules per security group" quota
:tada::tada::tada::tada:
Monitor the deployment of the hubs here :point_right: https://github.com/2i2c-org/infrastructure/actions/runs/11899615341