Closed pixeebot[bot] closed 7 months ago
Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file
Processing PR updates...
Thanks @pixeebot[bot] for opening this PR!
For COLLABORATOR only :
To add labels, comment on the issue
/label add label1,label2,label3
To remove labels, comment on the issue
/label remove label1,label2,label3
Check out the playback for this Pull Request here.
Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information
[!IMPORTANT]
Auto Review Skipped
Bot user detected.
To trigger a single review, invoke the
@coderabbitai review
command.
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
PR Details of @pixeebot[bot] in GregTechCE-GregTech : | OPEN | CLOSED | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
3 | 2 | 5 |
I'm confident in this change, but I'm not a maintainer of this project. Do you see any reason not to merge it?
If this change was not helpful, or you have suggestions for improvements, please let me know!
Switching to SecureRandom
is almost always the right tradeoff. This chart (source) shows the true lack of randomness (re: predictability) of Random
, if you needed more convincing:
If there are other concerns about this change, I'd love to hear about them!
This change may not be a priority right now, so I'll close it. If there was something I could have done better, please let me know!
You can also customize me to make sure I'm working with you in the way you want.
This change replaces all new instances of
java.util.Random
with the marginally slower, but much more securejava.security.SecureRandom
.We have to work pretty hard to get computers to generate genuinely unguessable random bits. The
java.util.Random
type uses a method of pseudo-random number generation that unfortunately emits fairly predictable numbers.If the numbers it emits are predictable, then it's obviously not safe to use in cryptographic operations, file name creation, token construction, password generation, and anything else that's related to security. In fact, it may affect security even if it's not directly obvious.
Switching to a more secure version is simple and our changes all look something like this:
More reading
* [https://owasp.org/www-community/vulnerabilities/Insecure_Randomness](https://owasp.org/www-community/vulnerabilities/Insecure_Randomness) * [https://metebalci.com/blog/everything-about-javas-securerandom/](https://metebalci.com/blog/everything-about-javas-securerandom/) * [https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/330.html](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/330.html)Powered by: pixeebot (codemod ID: pixee:java/secure-random)