Closed pixeebot[bot] closed 3 hours ago
This PR implements URL sandboxing for HTTP requests by replacing the standard requests.get
with a secure alternative safe_requests.get
. The change helps prevent Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks by enforcing restrictions on URL protocols and blocking access to known infrastructure targets.
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant FlaskApp
participant safe_requests
User->>FlaskApp: GET /request-url?loc=<url>
FlaskApp->>safe_requests: safe_requests.get(url)
safe_requests-->>FlaskApp: Response
FlaskApp-->>User: Response
classDiagram
class Task {
+String id
+String title
+String solution
+String difficulty
}
class fetch_leetcode_folder_tasks {
+list~Task~ fetch_leetcode_folder_tasks(Path solutions_folder)
}
Change | Details | Files |
---|---|---|
Replace standard requests library with security-enhanced safe_requests |
|
scripts/leetcode_directory_md.py |
By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the /korbit-review
command in a comment.
Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities are caused when an attacker can supply or modify a URL that reads or sends data to the server. The attacker can create a malicious request with a manipulated URL, when this request reaches the server, the server-side code executes the exploit URL causing the attacker to be able to read data from services that shouldn't be exposed.
Processing PR updates...
Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file
Hello @pixeebot[bot]! Thanks for opening this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:
scripts/leetcode_directory_md.py
:Line 23:80: E501 line too long (89 > 79 characters) Line 48:80: E501 line too long (133 > 79 characters) Line 50:80: E501 line too long (84 > 79 characters) Line 72:80: E501 line too long (86 > 79 characters) Line 88:80: E501 line too long (85 > 79 characters) Line 103:80: E501 line too long (81 > 79 characters)
Thanks @pixeebot[bot] for opening this PR!
For COLLABORATOR only :
To add labels, comment on the issue
/label add label1,label2,label3
To remove labels, comment on the issue
/label remove label1,label2,label3
[!IMPORTANT]
Review skipped
Bot user detected.
To trigger a single review, invoke the
@coderabbitai review
command.You can disable this status message by setting the
reviews.review_status
tofalse
in the CodeRabbit configuration file.
Description has been updated!
First PR by @pixeebot[bot]
PR Details of @pixeebot[bot] in TheAlgorithms-C : | OPEN | CLOSED | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 1 |
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.
This codemod sandboxes calls to
requests.get
to be more resistant to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks.Most of the time when you make a
GET
request to a URL, you're intending to reference an HTTP endpoint, like an internal microservice. However, URLs can point to local file system files, a Gopher stream in your local network, a JAR file on a remote Internet site, and all kinds of other unexpected and undesirable outcomes. When the URL values are influenced by attackers, they can trick your application into fetching internal resources, running malicious code, or otherwise harming the system. Consider the following code for a Flask app:In this case, an attacker could supply a value like
"http://169.254.169.254/user-data/"
and attempt to access user information.Our changes introduce sandboxing around URL creation that force developers to specify some boundaries on the types of URLs they expect to create:
This change alone reduces attack surface significantly because the default behavior of
safe_requests.get
raises aSecurityException
if a user attempts to access a known infrastructure location, unless specifically disabled.If you have feedback on this codemod, please let us know!
F.A.Q.
Why does this codemod require a Pixee dependency?
We always prefer to use built-in Python functions or one from a well-known and trusted community dependency. However, we cannot find any such control. If you know of one, please let us know.
Why is this codemod marked as Merge After Cursory Review?
By default, the protection only weaves in 2 checks, which we believe will not cause any issues with the vast majority of code:
However, on rare occasions an application may use a URL protocol like "file://" or "ftp://" in backend or middleware code.
If you want to allow those protocols, change the incoming PR to look more like this and get the best security possible:
Dependency Updates
This codemod relies on an external dependency. However, we were unable to automatically add the dependency to your project.
This library holds security tools for protecting Python API calls.
There are a number of places where Python project dependencies can be expressed, including
setup.py
,pyproject.toml
,setup.cfg
, andrequirements.txt
files. You may need to manually add this dependency to the proper location in your project.Manual Installation
For
setup.py
:For
pyproject.toml
(usingsetuptools
):For
setup.cfg
:For
requirements.txt
:For more information on adding dependencies to
setuptools
projects, see the setuptools documentation.If you are using another build system, please refer to the documentation for that system to determine how to add dependencies.
More reading
* [https://github.com/pixee/python-security/blob/main/src/security/safe_requests/api.py](https://github.com/pixee/python-security/blob/main/src/security/safe_requests/api.py) * [https://portswigger.net/web-security/ssrf](https://portswigger.net/web-security/ssrf) * [https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Server_Side_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Server_Side_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html) * [https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/11/23/owasp-top-10-deep-dive-defending-against-server-side-request-forgery/](https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/11/23/owasp-top-10-deep-dive-defending-against-server-side-request-forgery/) * [https://blog.assetnote.io/2021/01/13/blind-ssrf-chains/](https://blog.assetnote.io/2021/01/13/blind-ssrf-chains/)🧚🤖 Powered by Pixeebot
Feedback | Community | Docs | Codemod ID: pixee:python/url-sandbox
Summary by Sourcery
Enhance security by sandboxing URL requests with 'safe_requests' to prevent SSRF attacks, replacing 'requests.get' with 'safe_requests.get' for safer URL handling.
New Features:
Enhancements: