2lambda123 / cisagov-LME

Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

Verify SSL Certificates for Requests. #4

Closed pixeebot[bot] closed 5 months ago

pixeebot[bot] commented 5 months ago

This codemod checks that calls to the requests module API or the httpx library use verify=True or a path to a CA bundle to ensure TLS certificate validation.

The requests documentation warns that the verify flag

When set to False, requests will accept any TLS certificate presented by the server, and will ignore hostname mismatches and/or expired certificates, which will make your application vulnerable to man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. Setting verify to False may be useful during local development or testing.

Similarly, setting verify=False when using the httpx library to make requests disables certificate verification.

The changes from this codemod look like this:

  import requests

- requests.get("www.google.com", ...,verify=False)
+ requests.get("www.google.com", ...,verify=True)
...
import httpx

- httpx.get("www.google.com", ...,verify=False)
+ httpx.get("www.google.com", ...,verify=True)

This codemod also checks other methods in the requests module and httpx library that accept a verify flag (e.g. requests.post, httpx.AsyncClient, etc.)

More reading * [https://requests.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api/](https://requests.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api/) * [https://www.python-httpx.org/](https://www.python-httpx.org/) * [https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Manipulator-in-the-middle_attack](https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Manipulator-in-the-middle_attack)

I have additional improvements ready for this repo! If you want to see them, leave the comment:

@pixeebot next

... and I will open a new PR right away!

🧚🤖 Powered by Pixeebot

💬Feedback | 👥Community | 📚Docs | Codemod ID: pixee:python/requests-verify

performance-testing-bot[bot] commented 5 months ago

Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file

cr-gpt[bot] commented 5 months ago

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

codesyncapp[bot] commented 5 months ago

Check out the playback for this Pull Request here.

code-companion-ai[bot] commented 5 months ago

Processing PR updates...

coderabbitai[bot] commented 5 months ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review Skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
pep8speaks commented 5 months ago

Hello @pixeebot[bot]! Thanks for opening this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

[Line 35:80](https://github.com/2lambda123/cisagov-LME/blob/de69360d503598889b3f9d49e132bde55a81c4a6/Chapter 4 Files/export_dashboards.py#L35): E501 line too long (108 > 79 characters) [Line 131:80](https://github.com/2lambda123/cisagov-LME/blob/de69360d503598889b3f9d49e132bde55a81c4a6/Chapter 4 Files/export_dashboards.py#L131): E501 line too long (82 > 79 characters)

git-greetings[bot] commented 5 months ago

Thanks @pixeebot[bot] for opening this PR!

For COLLABORATOR only :

git-greetings[bot] commented 5 months ago
PR Details of @pixeebot[bot] in cisagov-LME : OPEN CLOSED TOTAL
1 3 4
sweep-ai[bot] commented 5 months ago

Sweep: PR Review

Authors of pull request: @pixeebot[bot]

This pull request enhances security by enabling SSL certificate verification for HTTP requests in the export_dashboards.py and helpers.py files.

In export_dashboards.py, the get_ids method's requests.get call was updated to set the verify parameter to True, ensuring that SSL certificates are verified when retrieving dashboard IDs. Similarly, the get_dashboard_json method's requests.post call was modified to enable SSL certificate verification when exporting dashboard JSON data.

In helpers.py, the make_request function was updated to enforce SSL certificate verification for both POST and GET requests by setting the verify parameter to True in the respective requests.post and requests.get calls.

These changes collectively improve the security of HTTP requests by ensuring that the server's identity is verified through SSL certificate checks.


Sweep Found These Issues

Chapter 4 Files/export_dashboards.py
  • Enabling SSL verification without proper handling of self-signed certificates may cause the requests to fail if the server uses a self-signed certificate.
  • https://github.com/2lambda123/cisagov-LME/blob/de69360d503598889b3f9d49e132bde55a81c4a6/Chapter%204%20Files%2Fexport_dashboards.py#L35 [View Diff](https://github.com/2lambda123/cisagov-LME/pull/4/files#diff-51531974e8027995a86c9d877f79ebc5e36ad624cab2b9de00310b03b41f3992R35)
testing/tests/api_tests/helpers.py
  • Enabling SSL certificate verification may cause requests to fail if the server's SSL certificate is self-signed or not trusted by the client's certificate store.
  • https://github.com/2lambda123/cisagov-LME/blob/de69360d503598889b3f9d49e132bde55a81c4a6/testing%2Ftests%2Fapi_tests%2Fhelpers.py#L13-L16 [View Diff](https://github.com/2lambda123/cisagov-LME/pull/4/files#diff-3fff88defd0700ae05af81f794bed44a13d9fa142e1c8e3692d178ae608c502fR13-R16)

pixeebot[bot] commented 5 months ago

I'm confident in this change, but I'm not a maintainer of this project. Do you see any reason not to merge it?

If this change was not helpful, or you have suggestions for improvements, please let me know!

pixeebot[bot] commented 5 months ago

Just a friendly ping to remind you about this change. If there are concerns about it, we'd love to hear about them!

pixeebot[bot] commented 5 months ago

This change may not be a priority right now, so I'll close it. If there was something I could have done better, please let me know!

You can also customize me to make sure I'm working with you in the way you want.