Closed pixeebot[bot] closed 6 months ago
Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file
Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information
Processing PR updates...
Check out the playback for this Pull Request here.
[!IMPORTANT]
Auto Review Skipped
Bot user detected.
To trigger a single review, invoke the
@coderabbitai review
command.You can disable this status message by setting the
reviews.review_status
tofalse
in the CodeRabbit configuration file.
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Thanks @pixeebot[bot] for opening this PR!
For COLLABORATOR only :
To add labels, comment on the issue
/label add label1,label2,label3
To remove labels, comment on the issue
/label remove label1,label2,label3
PR Details of @pixeebot[bot] in google-research-pegasus : | OPEN | CLOSED | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 |
This change may not be a priority right now, so I'll close it. If there was something I could have done better, please let me know!
You can also customize me to make sure I'm working with you in the way you want.
Imagine that someone handed you a pile of 100 apples and then asked you to count how many of them were green without putting any of them down. You'd probably find this quite challenging and you'd struggle to hold the pile of apples at all. Now imagine someone handed you the apples one at a time and asked you to just count the green ones. This would be a much easier task.
In Python, when we use list comprehensions, it's like we've created the entire pile of apples and asked the interpreter to hold onto it. Sometimes, a better practice involves using generator expressions, which create iterators that yield objects one at a time. For large data sets, this can turn a slow, memory intensive operation into a relatively fast one.
Using generator expressions instead of list comprehensions can lead to better performance. This is especially true for functions such as
any
where it's not always necessary to evaluate the entire list before returning. For other functions such asmax
orsum
it means that the program does not need to store the entire list in memory. These performance effects becomes more noticeable as the sizes of the lists involved grow large.This codemod replaces the use of a list comprehension expression with a generator expression within certain function calls. Generators allow for lazy evaluation of the iterator, which can have performance benefits.
The changes from this codemod look like this:
More reading
* [https://pylint.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user_guide/messages/refactor/use-a-generator.html](https://pylint.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user_guide/messages/refactor/use-a-generator.html) * [https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-generator-expression](https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-generator-expression) * [https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-list-comprehension](https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-list-comprehension)I have additional improvements ready for this repo! If you want to see them, leave the comment:
... and I will open a new PR right away!
🧚🤖Powered by Pixeebot (codemod ID: pixee:python/use-generator)