Closed pixeebot[bot] closed 6 months ago
Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file
Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information
Thanks @pixeebot[bot] for opening this PR!
For COLLABORATOR only :
To add labels, comment on the issue
/label add label1,label2,label3
To remove labels, comment on the issue
/label remove label1,label2,label3
Processing PR updates...
Check out the playback for this Pull Request here.
[!IMPORTANT]
Auto Review Skipped
Bot user detected.
To trigger a single review, invoke the
@coderabbitai review
command.You can disable this status message by setting the
reviews.review_status
tofalse
in the CodeRabbit configuration file.
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
PR Details of @pixeebot[bot] in markovmodel-PyEMMA : | OPEN | CLOSED | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 3 | 5 |
I'm confident in this change, but I'm not a maintainer of this project. Do you see any reason not to merge it?
If this change was not helpful, or you have suggestions for improvements, please let me know!
Just a friendly ping to remind you about this change. If there are concerns about it, we'd love to hear about them!
This change may not be a priority right now, so I'll close it. If there was something I could have done better, please let me know!
You can also customize me to make sure I'm working with you in the way you want.
This codemod sandboxes all instances of subprocess.run and subprocess.call to offer protection against attack.
Left unchecked,
subprocess.run
andsubprocess.call
can execute any arbitrary system command. If an attacker can control part of the strings used as program paths or arguments, they could execute arbitrary programs, install malware, and anything else they could do if they had a shell open on the application host.Our change introduces a sandbox which protects the application:
The default
safe_command
restrictions applied are the following:safe_command
functions attempt to parse the given command, and throw aSecurityException
if multiple commands are present./etc/passwd
, so the sandbox prevents arguments that point to these files that may be targets for exfiltration.There are more options for sandboxing if you are interested in locking down system commands even more.
Dependency Updates
This codemod relies on an external dependency. However, we were unable to automatically add the dependency to your project.
This library holds security tools for protecting Python API calls.
There are a number of places where Python project dependencies can be expressed, including
setup.py
,pyproject.toml
,setup.cfg
, andrequirements.txt
files. You may need to manually add this dependency to the proper location in your project.Manual Installation
For
setup.py
:For
pyproject.toml
(usingsetuptools
):For
setup.cfg
:For
requirements.txt
:For more information on adding dependencies to
setuptools
projects, see the setuptools documentation.If you are using another build system, please refer to the documentation for that system to determine how to add dependencies.
More reading
* [https://github.com/pixee/python-security/blob/main/src/security/safe_command/api.py](https://github.com/pixee/python-security/blob/main/src/security/safe_command/api.py) * [https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/OS_Command_Injection_Defense_Cheat_Sheet.html](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/OS_Command_Injection_Defense_Cheat_Sheet.html)I have additional improvements ready for this repo! If you want to see them, leave the comment:
... and I will open a new PR right away!
Powered by: pixeebot (codemod ID: pixee:python/sandbox-process-creation)