Closed pixeebot[bot] closed 4 months ago
Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information
Processing PR updates...
Check out the playback for this Pull Request here.
The Denial of Service (DoS) attack is focused on making a resource (site, application, server) unavailable for the purpose it was designed. There are many ways to make a service unavailable for legitimate users by manipulating network packets, programming, logical, or resources handling vulnerabilities, among others. Source: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Denial_of_Service
Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file
Thanks @pixeebot[bot] for opening this PR!
For COLLABORATOR only :
To add labels, comment on the issue
/label add label1,label2,label3
To remove labels, comment on the issue
/label remove label1,label2,label3
PR Details of @pixeebot[bot] in vespa-engine-vespa : | OPEN | CLOSED | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 8 | 10 |
[!IMPORTANT]
Review skipped
Bot user detected.
To trigger a single review, invoke the
@coderabbitai review
command.You can disable this status message by setting the
reviews.review_status
tofalse
in the CodeRabbit configuration file.
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
I'm confident in this change, but I'm not a maintainer of this project. Do you see any reason not to merge it?
If this change was not helpful, or you have suggestions for improvements, please let me know!
Unless you expect (and want to handle) reading lines greater than 5MB, this change should be safe. You could also change the second argument to a set more aggressive or conservative limit.
If there are other concerns about this change, I'd love to hear about them!
This change may not be a priority right now, so I'll close it. If there was something I could have done better, please let me know!
You can also customize me to make sure I'm working with you in the way you want.
This change hardens all
BufferedReader#readLine()
operations against memory exhaustion.There is no way to call
readLine()
safely since it is, by its nature, a read that must be terminated by the stream provider. Furthermore, a stream of data provided by an untrusted source could lead to a denial of service attack, as attackers can provide an infinite stream of bytes until the process runs out of memory.Fixing it is straightforward using an API which limits the amount of expected characters to some sane limit. This is what our changes look like:
More reading
* [https://vulncat.fortify.com/en/detail?id=desc.dataflow.abap.denial_of_service](https://vulncat.fortify.com/en/detail?id=desc.dataflow.abap.denial_of_service) * [https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/400.html](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/400.html)I have additional improvements ready for this repo! If you want to see them, leave the comment:
... and I will open a new PR right away!
🧚🤖 Powered by Pixeebot
💬Feedback | 👥Community | 📚Docs | Codemod ID: pixee:java/limit-readline