Closed pixeebot[bot] closed 6 months ago
Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file
Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information
Insufficient validation of input parameters in any API can lead to critical failures which may either halt services or allow attackers to gain access to privileged information and misuse business functions. Using undocumented or hidden input values may provide an attacker with the means to damage and/or infiltrate a web based service through the use of carefully crafted calls. Another form of attack may be to send data which is designed to cause services and/or indeed whole servers to crash.
Many web applications and APIs do not properly protect sensitive data, such as financial, healthcare, and PII. Attackers may steal or modify such weakly protected data to conduct credit card fraud, identity theft, or other crimes. Sensitive data may be compromised without extra protection, such as encryption at rest or in transit, and requires special precautions when exchanged with the browser. Source: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Top_Ten_Project
Processing PR updates...
Check out the playback for this Pull Request here.
[!IMPORTANT]
Auto Review Skipped
Bot user detected.
To trigger a single review, invoke the
@coderabbitai review
command.You can disable this status message by setting the
reviews.review_status
tofalse
in the CodeRabbit configuration file.
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Thanks @pixeebot[bot] for opening this PR!
For COLLABORATOR only :
To add labels, comment on the issue
/label add label1,label2,label3
To remove labels, comment on the issue
/label remove label1,label2,label3
PR Details of @pixeebot[bot] in volvo-cars-spinnaker-halyard : | OPEN | CLOSED | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 6 | 7 |
I'm confident in this change, but I'm not a maintainer of this project. Do you see any reason not to merge it?
If this change was not helpful, or you have suggestions for improvements, please let me know!
Just a friendly ping to remind you about this change. If there are concerns about it, we'd love to hear about them!
This change may not be a priority right now, so I'll close it. If there was something I could have done better, please let me know!
You can also customize me to make sure I'm working with you in the way you want.
This change defensively switches the order of literals in comparison expressions to ensure that no null pointer exceptions are unexpectedly thrown. Runtime exceptions especially can cause exceptional and unexpected code paths to be taken, and this can result in unexpected behavior.
Both simple vulnerabilities (like information disclosure) and complex vulnerabilities (like business logic flaws) can take advantage of these unexpected code paths.
Our changes look something like this:
More reading
* [https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/476.html](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/476.html) * [https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Java_Programming/Preventing_NullPointerException](https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Java_Programming/Preventing_NullPointerException) * [https://rules.sonarsource.com/java/RSPEC-1132/](https://rules.sonarsource.com/java/RSPEC-1132/)I have additional improvements ready for this repo! If you want to see them, leave the comment:
... and I will open a new PR right away!
Powered by: pixeebot (codemod ID: pixee:java/switch-literal-first)