3D-ICE-arXiv / Papers

3 stars 1 forks source link

BraTs 2018 #23

Open 3D-ICE-arXiv opened 3 years ago

3D-ICE-arXiv commented 3 years ago

The participants are called to address this task by using the provided clinically-acquired training data to develop their method and produce segmentation labels of the different glioma sub-regions. The sub-regions considered for evaluation are: 1) the "enhancing tumor" (ET), 2) the "tumor core" (TC), and 3) the "whole tumor" (WT)

https://www.med.upenn.edu/sbia/brats2018/data.html image

van Tulder, G., de Bruijne, M.: Why does synthesized data improve multi-sequence classification? In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) MICCAI

  1. LNCS, vol. 9349, pp. 531–538. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-24553-9 65
3D-ICE-arXiv commented 3 years ago

https://github.com/3D-ICE-arXiv/Papers/issues/73

210 MRI scans from patients with high-grade glioma are randomly split three times into 150, 30 and 30 scans for training, validation and testing, respectively, using a 3-fold Monte-carlo cross-validation scheme. To be able to easily compare our method against baselines, we focus on segmenting the whole tumour and use two of the four modalities, FLAIR and T1-gd, which have been found to be the most effective at this task

3D-ICE-arXiv commented 3 years ago

https://github.com/3D-ICE-arXiv/Papers/issues/76