Closed Sveino closed 1 year ago
A comment on the validation part. It will be good to directly use the SHACL definitions instead of NEK or other extensions see https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#validation-report and https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#results-validation-result
A comment on the validation part. It will be good to directly use the SHACL definitions instead of NEK or other extensions see https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#validation-report and https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#results-validation-result
yes, definitely. We should follow the validation-report. DIGIT has also seen the need for a summary report and we should follow their model for the summery. The model about is the current AutoFOS model. We might need to suggest to the SHACL community a way of creating a whitelist..
AutoFOS is extending the CGMES v2.5 (sixth IOP)
Looking like Core Manifest:
Validation:
Moving forward by using JSON-LD and rely on W3C standard. The following W3C: