search

3lbits / CIM4NoUtility

CIM for the Norwegian Power Utility
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International
22 stars 6 forks source link

Suggestion: Standardize Id and names for types #302

Open DatTronGuy opened 1 year ago

DatTronGuy commented 1 year ago

Might be outside of the scope for the project, but I think it would be a good idea to also standardize common elements where possible.

Working with data from multiple companies, we see alot of the same data being represented by different names and ID's:

Example - ConductorTypes: Customer 1: Id: 1, Name: "1x3xEX50" Id: 2, Name: "1x2xCU16"

Customer 2: Id: 334, Name: "1_3xEx50" Id: 225, Name: "1_2xCU16"

We also see cases where the same data has different names and ID's within the same company:

Company 2 - continued: Id: 226, Name: "1 2xCU16" Id: 227, Name: "1___2xCU16"

Etc, etc.

Sveino commented 1 year ago

This is inside the scope of DIGIN, but a bit more related to Produktdata. This will be address under topic of Reference data.

DatTronGuy commented 1 year ago

Okay.

Do you want me to move the issue to the ProduktData repository?

Sveino commented 1 year ago

No. It is OK to have it here. The principle will be documented in this repo, but the concrete reference data will follow the ProduktData repository.