search

3lbits / CIM4NoUtility

CIM for the Norwegian Power Utility
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International
23 stars 5 forks source link

Update Name Spesification #346

Open Sveino opened 6 months ago

Sveino commented 6 months ago

The current name specification https://github.com/3lbits/CIM4NoUtility/blob/develop/DIGIN10/docs/DIGIN10ModelingNamingStandard.adoc must be updated to include all element and all perspective.

Sveino commented 5 months ago

In the meeting we looked at the RDS specification in regards to the prefix to the different aspect. See RDS specification image

We like the idea that we include the aspect in the CIM naming standard. However, we are not that happy to use special sign, due to:

  1. Sign can have special meaning depending on the implementation (=, + etc)
  2. It is only understandable for the one that know, e.g. that "=" means Functional aspects

We there for suggest the following:

Aspect RDS CIM Usage CIM Class
Function '=' F The next level would be substation that is considered that it is unique for the MAS All specialisation of PowerSystemResource and ElementResource
Product '-' P Manufacture (or requiring organisation) would be the top item All specialisation of AssetInfo
Deployment '??' D Installed asset configuration All specialisation of AssetDeployment
Asset '??' A Manufactures Serie number All specialisation of Asset

With the current naming standard, a switch would get the following names:

Aspect Name Description
Function F FROLAND 132 EN Br1 Froland 132kV Engene 1 Breaker L
Product P Schneider F400-EvoPact SF Schneider Electric SF6 24-36
Deployment D FROLAND Br1 RC Froland Breaker 1 Remote Controlled
Asset A Schneider E34V11 Schneider E34V11 Serial number

This just highlights the difference in the name, and the use of the F, P and L. However, the product aspect should include the reference to the manufacture product name.