3liz / lizmap-web-client

Transfer a QGIS project on a server, Lizmap is providing the web interface to browse it
https://www.lizmap.com
Mozilla Public License 2.0
249 stars 141 forks source link

digitization form missing when editing existing feature #2662

Open josemvm opened 2 years ago

josemvm commented 2 years ago

What is the bug?

hi

the digitization form missing when editing existing feature, only avaiable for new features

thanks a lot

Steps to reproduce the issue

edit existing feature

Lizmap version

3.4.6

QGIS desktop version

3.16.14

QGIS server version

3.16.14

Operating system

Ubuntu 20.04

Browsers

Firefox

Browsers version

95

Relevant log output

No response

gioman commented 2 years ago

@josemvm duplicate of https://github.com/3liz/lizmap-web-client/issues/2611 ?

Gustry commented 2 years ago

And will be fixed with https://github.com/3liz/lizmap-web-client/pull/2657 ?

nboisteault commented 2 years ago

It won't be fixed by https://github.com/3liz/lizmap-web-client/pull/2657 . It is a known limitation, there are two different controls for creation and modification in OpenLayers 2. Digitization has not been linked to the modification control and won't be soon. I think we'll remake the whole edition part with OpenLayers 6 when funded.

gioman commented 2 years ago

It won't be fixed by #2657

@nboisteault what is that for then? :)

I think we'll remake the whole edition part with OpenLayers 6 when funded.

Is there an active campaign on that?

nboisteault commented 2 years ago

@gioman It allows access to snap ;)

There is no active campaign. We need to work on this seriously in 2022.

gioman commented 2 years ago

@gioman It allows access to snap ;)

@nboisteault oh I see.

There is no active campaign. We need to work on this seriously in 2022.

Let us know when it will start then.

3liz-bot commented 2 years ago

This issue is missing some feedbacks. 👻 Please have a look to the discussion, thanks. 🦎

3liz-bot commented 2 years ago

This issue is missing some feedbacks. 👻 Please have a look to the discussion, thanks. 🦎