It is perfectly valid to mutate properties in update as long as you call super.update()at the end. This rule incorrectly marked these cases as invalid.
It now detects mutations to observed properties aftersuper.update has been called and flags those as problems.
Fixes #62
maybe cc @larsdenbakker to check that i worded the docs correctly.
really the rule should be renamed but it'd be a breaking change and seems close enough as it is now.
It is perfectly valid to mutate properties in
updateas long as you callsuper.update()at the end. This rule incorrectly marked these cases as invalid.It now detects mutations to observed properties after
super.updatehas been called and flags those as problems.Fixes #62
maybe cc @larsdenbakker to check that i worded the docs correctly.
really the rule should be renamed but it'd be a breaking change and seems close enough as it is now.