Closed HerrDietz closed 1 month ago
good catch. seems like a bug for sure
contributions welcome, but if not, ill try take a look soon 👍
I'll see if I can get around to taking a look at it this weekend. If I do, I'll be happy to post a pull request.
its probably as simple as changing this condition to also check for !propConfig.state
:
but i'd start by adding a test with similar code to your example and go from there
I have opened a pullrequest. Would you be so kind to review it?
Fixed by #203
In the following class, the
attribute-names
” rule is applied to theisFoo
property, although it is decorated with@state
and therefore has no public attribute.The rule is applied as well if the static properties syntax is used.