Closed 4flixt closed 4 years ago
I am working on it, do not trust these results. There was a problem with pump 2 producing negative pressures. That one is solved, but maybe not all pressures are solved. I will fix it
Updated. Now it should be better. If you look at the last figure in the "run_simulation" (sorry, no figure labels, was doing it quickly), pressure levels are now in a similar scale to what you had before (still, some negative values sometimes, seems not many). I am still working on putting some control boundaries that make sense, and later on will try to launch a few randomized (initial tank level, demand patterns) simulations
ok I'll wait for good results than before I continue the clustering investigation. Thank you!
I am just starting to realize where this negative pressure results from. I read in the documentation:
In demand-driven simulation, the pressure in the system depends on the node demands. The mass balance and headloss equations described above are solved assuming that node demands are known and satisfied. This assumption is reasonable under normal operating conditions and for use in network design. Both simulators can run hydraulics using demand-driven simulation.
From my understanding, the demand is always satisfied, even when the network can't provide. This results in negative pressures :man_facepalming:
Yes, indeed. Sorry, I thought this was clear. In a Demand Driven scenario (like the one we are adopting), the demand is always satisfied. As said in a previous answer, negative pressures are an artefact (it would mean that the water table is lower than the elevation...). Pressure driven simulations are feasible only with the WNTR simulator...
I have been continuing to work on the clustering and investigated the new
results_sim.pkl
file which was created withc-town_true_network_simplified.inp
(I believe), I know those are only preliminary results but I found that the pressure trajectories look a bit odd ( see below). They also don't allow for a similar quality of clustering. Can the pressure really be negative? For comparison, here are the previous pressure trajectories, which yielded the good clustering results: