Closed jparise closed 7 years ago
@josevalim, what do you think about this approach? Was it not an option back when you introduced package.exs
in c1973c8?
Guys come on. We have mad
. We fucked yours rebar
, rebar3
, mix
, hex
, erlang.mk
.
I'm just waiting when I can remove all this shit.
@5HT rebar is mainstream, de-facto standard. If mad
is a good alternative, it would be even better if there were some input from mad
maintainers on how to use it in elixir project for packages like fs
.
There are still problems with the mix-based package on hex.pm (see #33). Rather than sort through them, it seems more straightforward to just publish this library as a native Erlang / rebar3 package instead.
This change updates the README.md with instructions on how to do that. It also removes package.exs, which is no longer needed if we use rebar3 exclusively.