Closed raucao closed 3 years ago
Documenting ideas we discussed so far:
@67P/core @67P/collaborators What do you think would be a good default kredits amount as percentage of the overall amount? (Keep in mind that one should be able to switch from giving review kredits to assigning a co-author.)
I think something like 20% might be a good number to start with.
Note from weekly call: @bumi, @gregkare, @skddc agree that it's a good number to start with.
So far I'm able to accumulate all reviews and the corresponding kredits for a given timeframe.
What should we put in the details of the contribution entry? Just the list of the pull request URLs or all of the payload data for every review?
List of URLs seems enough to me. Ideally we can turn it into separate contribution objects in IPFS later, once the kredits API wrapper supports that.
On GitHub and Gitea, the reviewers should also get kredits (at least for medium/large contributions).