Closed j-oliveras closed 7 years ago
hi, yes you are correct across the board.. i didn't document that particular use case for Content
as i felt neither table-layout nor its docs were yet complete enough to expose to users.. however, it is still functional and i used it in a few of the examples.. feel free to use, since you figured it all out..
Thanks.
it's documented now
Content documentation has no reference to this possible content declaration (object with options and data, both optionals but one required).
Reading the source code, I understand that the option object has the same type as table-layout options and data has the same type as an array of objects decribed into Content document (the same as table-layout data).
Are my assumptions correct?